World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
It is not.
Your Chinese Government tells you who is best, and you believe them.
That does not mean, in anyway, those people are indeed the best at what they do.
You blindly trust your government to make that determination for you.
Let me make your governments undemocratic nature completely obvious to you by simply not talking about China for a bit.
Would you consider America GREAT right now? According to it's current President, it's the greatest it's ever been. The head of the FBI? The greatest. Our FDA? The greatest. Our Education department? The greatest.
Just like China, Trump now decides who is the "BEST" for us. So on paper, according to him and our Whitehouse website, we're now the BEST there is, run by great people with a great president to Make America Great Again (MAGA) TM.
Except all that is bullshit. You know it. I know it. They're just SAYING they're great. Using the media they own to repeat that lie until everyone who hears it believes them.
So now a large portion of our population is MAGA, and fully believe a convicted ex-con reality TV pedofile is a "GREAT" president. A washed up podcaster is a "GREAT" head of our FBI, an insane heroine addict with brain worms is a "GREAT" doctor, and the wife of a scandalous wrestling federation owner makes for a "GREAT" teacher.
None of that is actually GREAT. They're all just about the furthest you could get from what "great" is.
All these morons just have enough popularity to lie about being GREAT. And nearly 40% of this country is stupid enough to believe them.
The same is true with how you feel about your "Chinese Democracy" being filled with the "BEST" people.
It's not. It's just filled with whoever your government wants to call "BEST." And you, just like MAGA, blindly trust their opinion. As that's the way you were raised.
In reality, your government is entirely built around what's best for THEM. Not YOU. So it's filled with similar idiots.
That's why it's BEST for Chinese Democracy if YOU DO NOT TALK ABOUT:
Someone who protested your government for Democracy in Hong Kong and was jailed for 5 years for it. Jailed because what was BEST for "Chinese Democracy" was suppressing any conversation about real Democracy. That's why he was punished, and why you can no longer discuss it without threat of the same. Something your government has been doing for it's entire existence.
All because what's BEST for Chinese Democracy, is YOU NOT discussing or thinking about what's best for YOU.
So unless YOU have an actual say in what's BEST for YOU, you do not have a democracy. You have something pretending to be one, while also pretending to know what's BEST for you.
Same as our current US government. Pretending to be Democratic and GREAT, while it's actually all about just doing whatever Orange man feels like that day. Invading Iran, capturing the President of Venezuala, all of that was GREAT according to our government, the same way yours tells you what's BEST.
The difference is this US government is obviously bullshit to anyone born before it. Yet clearly the same isn't true for you. If you were born before 1989 you would have seen your current government target, expel, and assassinate it's best doctors, teachers and generally the "BEST" people they had if they happen to be pro-democracy.
Tianneman Square is banned from discussion in your country because it's proof your government actively killed pro-democratic protestors including students. Running them over with military vehicles, burning their remains, and then washing them down street drains.
All to make way for "Chinese Democracy" TM. The Chinese version of MAGA. Which is what you live in now.
The reason you're not allowed to know about Tianneman Square is that it proves your current government is not at all Democratic and actively killed people who supported real democracy. You not knowing this is what they consider "BEST" for you. Because then you might realize you don't live in a democracy.
At least I'm free enough to admit that in my own country. Specifically, America is no longer a Democracy.
You'd be jailed if you tried to say the same. Because that's what's BEST for those who run China. They fear you knowing this and trying to change their government into something better for YOU, so they make it illegal for you to express any other opinion than the one you're currently arguing.
It's literally illegal for you to express any form of agreement with what I've said. And you really think that's democracy? Democracy isn't being trained to think China #1 > You #1. That's just brainwashing. Same as MAGA.
Logic doesn't need non-NES sources.
You might as well be complaining my sources weren't MAGA enough for you. Logic is immutable, that's why my entire argument is constructed through comparison to MAGA.
You can't say MAGA is bad without agreeing China is bad for the same reasons. You also can't say China is good without agreeing MAGA is good for the same reasons.
That makes my comparison impossible to attack as untrue and why you are running from it as needing sources. I don't need sources to see a square peg fits a square hole. I can just point out both are square shaped, which I have.
Same with "repeating things that have been disproven by basically by every Chinese person."
That's an assumption you're making. You might as well be saying "repeating things that have been disproven by basically every MAGA."
They have disproven nothing. They just say they have. Same as you. You are confusing opinions as facts, as long as they come from a Chinese source. Same as MAGA confusing Trumps opinions for facts if they come from a MAGA source.
Here's China banning a Winnie the Pooh movie from releasing there:
Here's an explanation for why they banned it that will likely get you arrested for reading:
On that note, by all means research the above on your own internet from non-NES sources, and see what you find. I'm sure your results will be completley unbiased as only the "BEST" results have been pre-chosen as available for you to read.
Go look up Liu Xiaobo and then explain how your result is the "BEST" at describing his work and who he is.
The Logic I'm using is called:
Comparative Analysis Here's a link on how it's used. And how I used it to compare MAGA to China and why that works so well. .
Because, No, MAGA is not a meritocracy at all in any way. It's laughably corrupt and run by idiots. Same as your government, though you just can't actually say that without getting in trouble. That's not "BEST" for you in any conceivable way. Just for China. which is my point.
I proved China banned this Winnie the Pooh movie from launching after you claimed China never did that at all. That it being banned at all was Western Propaganda.
Now you accept China did indeed ban it, then moved your goal posts from it not being banned at all, to being okay that it was banned for a while. Now the propaganda I'm believing is that it's not available.
Cool. Can you tell me in a single sentence why it was banned to begin with? Now that you are actually admitting it was?
You can't. I know this. Pretty sure you do too.
You literally do not have that freedom. Because that's what's "Best' for China. So you won't answer this.
Same reason you can't and won't say Liu Xiaobo's full name.
The CIA does not run the Nobel committee. It's an independent agency. Otherwise, Trump would have won the peace prize he wanted this year.
So Liu Xiaobo winning the Nobel Peace prize in 2010 had nothing to due with the CIA. The Nobel committee awarded it to him and said the following about his works that you're not allowed to read or know exist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liu_Xiaobo
Let me guess, somehow, I'm still believing some form of propaganda put in place by the woke leftist CIA? And MOST importantly - these idiots somehow magically invented the Tianeman square massacre as well.
This is a great moment to try and summarize my argument in a new way:
I'll admit you're right about everything if you can do all of the following in a single comment -
You literally aren't allowed to do these things. So you won't.
You'll instead write up a page of excuses as to why this is. And it will all be obvious propaganda the same as it is with MAGA. Because that's what's "BEST" for China: you repeating lies that protect them because otherwise you'll realize you have no power to do anything other than that.
FYI, I'll happily link you to pictures of the corpses left behind at Tianamen Square to prove it happened. It includes pictures of the student protestors there holding pro-democracy signs and usually makes whoever I'm talking to in China never respond again.
The neat trick about knowing about the prison you're in better than you, is that I can just use it against you.
China just calls that prison Democracy. And you believe them because you have no choice otherwise.
By ALL means, let me know if you'd like me to prove my point more clearly.