this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
381 points (97.3% liked)
Not The Onion
21236 readers
1735 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I still think we should destroy it. We basically have to options here:
Option 1 is certain death. With option 2 there's at least some hope for a new beginning.
Of course we don't have a way to destroy the universe yet but we have 10^78 years to figure it out. Once we have the means to start some chain reaction that rips space time itself and destroys the entire universe we should do it.
Option 1 is hope for a new beginning too depending on certain theories.
There's a lot of fancy math involved that I don't understand but the upshot is that mathematically a completely barren uniform universe and an infinitely dense point are technically identical and theoretically one could spontaniously become the other.
The key is arbitrarily large timescales. It doesn't really matter how small the chance of spontaneous self-organisation of a state of maximum entropy is because the timescales involved are effectively infinite.
That's the scary part. There is a infinitely small probability that the state of maximum entropy will spontaneously organize in anything, right? Even into the exact form of you sitting in front of a computer and reading this comment. So on a infinite time scale at some point you will just pop out of nothing and suffocate in a vacuum, basically teleported from this very moment into future.
But not really because the universe as we understand it today has some limits on what it can organize itself into, right? So in the end we can end up with just cold emptiness forever. (if I understand all this correctly)
Ah yea, the topological restart !
Of course, if we can prove those theories and we will know our universe will eventually give birth to a new one we won't have to destroy it. But if we prove that the future is just infinite emptiness I think we should.
Quite frankly given enough time I'm confident we could do pretty much anything. I mean look at us, with our blackboards, our theories, our banging two rocks against each other.
Ragnarok is going to sort all this shit out.
I doubt anything is permanent, death included.
Thinking like this is what ensures that the most powerful beings in the universe will never let us evolve past monkeys on skateboards.
You really think the most powerful beings in the universe decide the fate of humanity based on my lemmy comments? Thanks. For a moment there I thought no one cares what I think.