Progressive Politics

4546 readers

548 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world

114

Mamdani Plans to Open First City-Owned Grocery Store in East Harlem (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mayor Zohran Mamdani will announce on Sunday that New York City will open a city-owned grocery store in East Harlem in Manhattan by the end of his first term, taking an early step to deliver on a key campaign pledge.

The mayor wants to spend roughly $30 million to build the store at La Marqueta, a city-owned marketplace under elevated train tracks in a predominantly Latino neighborhood. Mr. Mamdani will announce the plan at a speech on Sunday to mark his first 100 days as mayor.

As a candidate, Mr. Mamdani said he would create five city-owned grocery stores, one in each borough, in hopes of bringing down food costs for struggling New Yorkers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

🤣😂🤣😂🤣 nationalizing food brokers, straight up fascism.
Wall Street will know what you eat, how much you buy, how much to data break you, insurance premium, and New Yorkers, who still have deathcamps, will slop it up.

True socialism would made a public foodbank where everyone can eat for free. No questions, no cameras, no cops. Come eat, cook, have a good time.

But that's not Mamdani true praxis.

[–] nerdyshades@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Uh, what? The article doesn't mention implementation. How did you get that he was nationalizing "food brokers"?

There's also no mention of surveillance in this city-run store.

Also, fascism's tenet of merging with corporate power doesn't start with small businesses, it starts with large corporations as an economic boost.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -4 points 2 weeks ago

nationalizing “food brokers”?

Theory: Why do you need a merchant to set prices for food already cultivated by farmers, when you can directly source the food from locals?

By making state food brokers chains (“grocery stores”), he can capitalize on your desires and needs, instead of you sourcing your needs instead.

no mention of surveillance

I’m wondering your level of naïveté here. Which level of surveillance are you comfortable with? Patriot Act style finance surveillance, or NY’s own infrastructure? I ask, because food brokers already analyze and invest in your habits.

fascism’s tenet of merging with corporate power doesn’t start with small businesses, it starts with large corporations as an economic boost.

New York is quite a big corporation, and if you live in it, you're already paying for it. Unless somehow found a way to exempt yourself from being taxed. The merging of your taxation with your food habits, is quite a power to leverage huh.

[–] HarneyToker@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What happens when someone comes and takes/eats more than their fair share and it does not leave enough for everyone else? What happens when “scalpers” come to take the food and resell it?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Same thing that happens when capitalists pillage indigenous folks off their resources in the Middle East: they are starved to death.
Starvation is a capitalist arsenal. There’s plenty of food to go around, store, and reharvest.
Mamdani isn't interested feeding New York by nationalizing food brokering, but seeing how well he can starve us just enough to be obedient Little Eichmann.

What happens when “scalpers” come to take the food and resell it?

This quite economically doesn't make sense, since folks could go to the foodbank giving and reharvesting free food. “Scalpers’” competition would be nobody, because they would have none to convert the “stolen” free food into something valuable the scalpers can liquidate. Food spoils btw. It's not in scalpers interests to keep “stolen” free food longer than their expiration.

Are you by any chance confused about what progressive politics are all about?