this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
472 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

21204 readers
2164 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

fictional scenarios of incest relations

Not incest. Step relations are not blood relations. The parents marry and combine their existing families.

[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The article is referring to step-incest relations.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Which aren't a thing.

Two step siblings have no legal relation as far as I'm aware. It's just two people who's parents have married. There's nothing stopping them having their own relationship.

If you're concerned about non consensual events, that's just plain old sexual abuse and rape. That's completely different.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I agree with this sentiment and the concept of 'step-siblings' may work as expected when the kids are like 5.

But if they are instead late teens, well, the parents should be realistic about what happens when you put generally horny strangers under one roof... It should be a risk factor that weighs heavily about joining your families in one household.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)