this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
80 points (98.8% liked)

Australia

4983 readers
57 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...The relatively small difference between Victoria, where public transport was free, and NSW – where fares remained unchanged – suggests price is not the main constraint on mode shift. Access, travel time, service reliability and the ability to make specific trips appear to matter more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago

Not surprising. The problem is not the cost, it is the quality of the service/experience. If governments aren't willing to spend large amounts of money on improving the service/experience, then the public will continue to avoid using public transport. But if the public avoids using public transport, there is no incentive for political parties to take major public transport infrastructure improvements to an election. Basically you need a progressive and proactive government with the political security to take risks and a financial climate that allows for that. With those requirements, you can see why it doesn't happen.