this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
354 points (98.6% liked)

World News

55698 readers
2029 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nanlux_user@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good! Wish it was longer. These fucking assholes need to learn that actions have consequences.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

More than that. They need to learn how to behave like a civilized person in society.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It sounds horrible, but I think we lost something when we made it impossible to get away with fighting someone for doing stupid shit. There's too many cameras now and, even if they started it by doing something antagonistic, you'll be arrested and held accountable because they technically didn't assault you. If this happened in like the 50s (discounting race and everything else, only his actions), he'd get his ass kicked. Everyone around would likely support it.

Now, the only social system to punish them is shaming, and shaming them is exactly what they want. Shaming them gives them publicity. Publicity gets them money. Literally the best option is to ignore them, which absolutely does nothing to stop it, but at least it doesn't encourage it.

I'm not saying we should go back to the 50s. I'm only saying that sometimes people need consequences, like you said. If the legal system can't provide it, we need an extra-legal solution, and we don't have that anymore. We did in the past, though it was often used for evil (lynching and lots of racist/homophobic/other-phobic stuff), it also served a purpose.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Agreed. Shame is weaponized by the shameless, especially in our "attention as currency" culture, and other consequences are necessary to maintain a polite self-policed society. I think a lot of laws about this kind of thing were written for legal expediency over sociological improvement.

I do believe some places have "mutual combat" and "fighting words" clauses.

Basically, if you're willingly antagonizing and harassing somehody with insults and/or threats, especially depending on severity, they get some leeway in shutting you up if asking nicely doesn't help.

Mutual combat is basically the law being looser when "two people agreed to fight each other" which, I dunno, it felt worth mentioning lol.

Unfortunately I think we're seeing a breakdown of humans keeping each other in check and willingness to act based on a severely litigious society (engaging with the law can quickly ruin your life even if you're innocent), and adult expectations mimicking the inneffectual "zero tolerance" policies of failed school systems, where any physical contact for any reason is your fault, and you're supposed to go tattle to government and let them slowly do nothing if somebody is being a problem.

On one hand, you're right, at least this legal framework somewhat prevents mobs of violent vigilantes enforcing their views on others, but also it cushions and lessens the burden of responsibility from malignant social parasites (like this guy, and the ones in office).

*I assert that this comment is entirely opinion and I'm by no means a lawyer. This should be obvious because Internet. Lol