this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
1176 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

21266 readers
2742 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 172 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I’ll never understand how people were OK with putting middlemen with an interest in denying care between them and lifesaving treatment.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago (2 children)

because apparently, the alternative is communism, and it will have death panels that will decide if you get to live in order to save costs...

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Insurance companies are deathpanels though...

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe that was their point...

[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well maybe they are private enterprise death panels, but they trust them more than theoretical government death panels because the private sector is more efficient than government at cutting costs, such as, um, actually paying for needed care and oh shit they did not think that through.

edit: I meant to reply that to the comment above, but oh well. It's here now.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that was my point.

they prefer real material death panels, than the alternative, because it might have theoretical death panels. that no country with public healthcare has.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The danger of commenting first thing after waking up!

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

same, haven't got my coffee yet, how do you take yours?

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sugar and two creams usually. Sometimes black. Black and sugar today

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Insurance is worse than communism in this case.

Tax paid universal healthcare and healthcare insurance both work on the idea of socializing the cost.

The difference is that insurance companies also need to make a profit too feed the owners. Since they don't actually produce anything that can make a profit, the only place they can grab the "profit" is by denying cover.

American healthcare insurance is exactly the same picture that is shown when people try to explain why communism doesn't work.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Nearly everything is better than the US&A’s take on capitalism.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Tax paid universal healthcare and healthcare insurance both work on the idea of socializing the cost.

I think if we used their language it might help: we should outsource healthcare costs.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The Acquired podcast went over this history very briefly in their Epic episode and it's so crazy how close we were to having universal healthcare.

Tl;dl:

  • during WW2, wage controls were in place due to a large demand of workers but very few people available due to being in the war
  • unions and companies alike were looking for ways to make their positions and companies more attractive.
  • government permitted benefits to augment salaries. Some companies started offering health insurance.
  • back then going to the doctor was NOT the bankrupt causing thing that is today and was considered a fringe benefit
  • larger companies were able to offer better incentives due to healthcare benefits
  • add a few years of corruption and "market forces" and you have the system we have now

So blame wage controls during WW2.

Oh and the Brits were facing similar forces when they were starting to stand up their healthcare system but decided instead to hire people to build a robust system so everyone didn't have to pay anything at the point of sale.

Yeah, it really was that simple.

[–] grranibal@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

I prefer to blame the people who take advantage of the sick

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Universal healthcare is one of those things that's not only tricky to set up but also to keep going. Here in the UK, yep the NHS is amazing. But it's also terribly underfunded - despite taking over 10% of GDP (IIRC) we still have long waiting lists, and healthcare staff are overworked and underpaid. Greedy vermin are constantly looking for opportunities to privatise it, the only reason this hasn't already happened is that it would be hugely unpopular. I'm pretty sure almost everyone in the country would prefer more taxes be spent on the NHS and maybe a bit less on, say, fossil fuel subsidies - but here we are. Still, it's one of the few things our country can actually be proud of.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago

the only reason long waiting lists don't exist in the us is because some people just are not getting the things they need done at all. Even people with insurance you often can't find a specialist who takes it and the insurance denies things like in the article. The wait is very long when its impossible to get the treatment at all.

I wouldn't say it's tricky to keep going. Keeping it going is simply a case of funding it.

Now, repairing the damage of years of underfunding? That's tricky

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

add a few years of corruption and "market forces" and you have the system we have now

Sir you are being shareholder-phobic

/s

[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, capitalists own the government that made this possible and they know a gap in the market when they see one...

[–] krisevol@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

And Obama made it mandatory to sign up with these crooks.