Measures of “richest countries” can be misleading. A new prosperity index — looking at income, GDP and how wealth translates into quality of life, social cohesion and long-term development — does not place the US, Germany, or France in the top ten.
Europe dominates global wealth rankings, but what it actually means to be a “rich country” depends heavily on how prosperity is measured and who benefits from it.
“Being the richest country in the world is not just about producing a lot,” the analysis from a financial services comparison platform HelloSafe states.
“It is measured by how that wealth concretely translates into the daily life of the ordinary citizen. In 2026, the answer is Norway.”
The group argues that GDP per capita alone can distort comparisons, since it assumes national output is evenly shared across the population.
Ireland illustrates the issue. GDP per capita stands at around $150,000 in purchasing power terms, but much of this is driven by multinationals such as Apple, Google and Pfizer.
The gap between output and household income is estimated at around $70,000 per person. Related
Addressing these limitations, HelloSafe’s “Prosperity Index” ranks more than 50 countries using a combined score out of 100.
It draws on data from the IMF, World Bank, UNDP, Eurostat and OECD, bringing together income, inequality and wider social indicators into a single measure of prosperity.
On this basis, Europe dominates the top of the ranking, with the five richest countries all located in the region. Small countries push through
Norway leads the table, supported by the world’s highest GNI (Gross National Income, the total income earned by a country’s people and businesses, including income earned abroad)and a highly balanced social model.
Ireland is second, with high real incomes despite an inflated GDP figure. Luxembourg is third, slipping from the top position for the first time since the index began.
Continue Reading HERE
It's also not just median inequality-adjusted net disposable GDP (PPP) per capita.* That measure is mostly useful for looking at what people can effectively buy, so I'll call that the "Genuine Economic Prosperity Index" (GEPI).
* Explanation of that wordful
Median = 50% of people have more or less than thatinequality-adjusted = takes economic inequality into account, so a society with high inequality will score worse. The Gini index does this, basically.
net disposable = after tax and regular expenses (rent, groceries, healthcare...)
GDP = how much is produced
PPP = how much one can buy per 'unit' produced
per capita = per person
But when you have a lot of money and nothing much is accessible, then there's not much. Vice versa, you might not have a lot of material wealth, but you have all of the basics and good friendships. That's invaluable.
Thus, you also want to look at the Social Progress Index, which looks at for example electrification, access to water, inclusivity, equity, housing, education, healthcare coverage, environmental quality, perceived corruption, and so on.
Unsurprisingly, the top 10 is covered by Nordic countries, with the remainder being West European countries. Trade unions, striking, and voting for progressive, pro-labour policies help a great deal. My bias is thus: go join a trade union and strike; don't vote neolib or right. Don't be bereft, vote left.
The inequality-adjusted HDI is also handy. Disease-free life expectancy could be another.
A minor sidetrack... some personal 'biases'. I also like the Copenhagenisation Index (which comprehensively looks at bicycle friendliness). A bicycle-friendy society leads to fewer traffic jams, is cleaner, and makes people healthier by exercise.
Another is to look at how much % of businesses are decentral, unionised worker-owned cooperatives (DUWOCs) with little income/wealth/net worth differences. The more, the better.