this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
200 points (93.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47817 readers
1093 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Especially as a human can normally consent to death but a pet can't

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why not use “they”? Its gender neutral without being objectifying

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Because the talking animals I know tend to prefer "it". The ones who were unfortunately born in human bodies, I mean.

And because singular "they" implies personhood, and I don't want to project personhood onto animals. Instead, I want us to decouple our ethics from personhood and treat non-persons with some level of equality with persons. You shouldn't need to be a person in order to have rights. Calling animals people just reifies the supremacy of persons, and causes more issues down the line when it comes to the questions of non-persons who aren't animals, and their rights. Like aliens and AIs.

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Because the talking animals I know tend to prefer “it”. The ones who were unfortunately born in human bodies, I mean.

If they can talk, they have a human mind. And apparently they have a human body. Idk man kinda just sounds like you’re talking to humans to me

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's what bigots say about trans people.

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Just because its bigoted in one context doesn't mean its bigoted in every context. Here’s an alternative contextual framing for you: “this is delusional” is also what sane people say to people experiencing delusions (such as, eg, the delusion that you are an animal, or that you are Jesus, or whatever)

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The current context is that a layperson with no credentials or experience in psychopathology is handing out medical advice and being a bit of a jerk about it.

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If someone said “I am literally God” would you need to be a trained psychiatrist to identify that as a delusion? You would not. Same goes here.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 6 hours ago

Your reducto ad absurdum has no effect because I respect divinekin and think their identities as deities are valid. It's kind of a terrible argument because you haven't explained what's supposedly wrong about any of these identities, you've just pointed at them and gone "LOOK AT THAT! IT'S WEIRD!" and expected Me to agree with you. Pretty weak strategy tbh.