this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
52 points (96.4% liked)

Selfhosted

60093 readers
933 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require your active participation in selfhosting or related communities, or the post will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, and your account is at least 7 days old, your post is exempt from this rule as long as you continue to engage in comments.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After trying out Cosmos Cloud (and it not working for the clients), I'm back at square one again. I was going to install Docker Desktop, but I see it warns that it runs on a VM. Will this be a problem when trying to remote connect to certain services, like Mealie or Jellyfin?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hezaethos@piefed.zip 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

ease of use.

I'm a noob at networking.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

there's only one way to get better at it. by doing it.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Or if it’s not something that’s valuable to you just do it the easy way.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Don't think Docker Desktop would simplify networking, unless it added a new feature since I last used it ~2 years ago.

[–] squinky@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Docker Desktop isn’t needed on Linux. If you want a UI, try Portainer

[–] ser@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Check out CasaOS. Really easy to set up.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Just throw your services in a docker-compose.yml file, create a docker bridge network, and assign the:

networks:
    - YourDockerNetwork

To the services in the yaml file, specify the ports it want’s to open with

ports:
    - 8080:8080

And let it start up. If you want to get more complicated suggest reading the man page which really isn’t that long of a read.

Networking really cannot be simplified, you have to view it in a logistical way of how is Point A communicating with Point B which where Docker bridge networks come into play, they make the communication easy, if all your containers are all on the same docker network all you have to do is specify http://ContainerName:Port for them to communicate back and forth internally.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What does networking have to do with docker? You haven't explained what you're trying to achieve.

[–] Hezaethos@piefed.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Access containers remotely