this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
160 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

62351 readers
830 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Shit, I am actually building a webtool and thought Minio could be a good part to be a file storage in it. What's an good alternative?

Edit: I try "garage"

[–] tapdattl@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

There's also SeaweedFS that I've used as an S3 compatible fileserver

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

...a hard disk? you can just write data to a file

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not if you want to validate S3 compatibility for an actual future use case or, * can you imagine*, just for the fun of it.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 5 months ago (5 children)

i'll give you the second case, but nobody should plan for putting stuff on aws with the world as it looks right now...

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Practically every other object storage provider offers an S3-compatible API.

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

I use S3 with OVH at my workplace. So it's not just aws / google.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

S3 isn't just an AWS thing anymore. It has kind of become the standard object storage protocol, and almost every cloud provider uses it aside from a few the made their own API's (e.g. Azure Blob storage)

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

IONOS and ImpossibleCloud for instance are ones we use.
I think Hetzner and OVH also offer S3 buckets.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Scaleway, Exoscale, Cyso, Contabo, UpCloud, and others too

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

There are numerous other vendors with S3 API-compatibility.

[–] searabbit@piefed.social 0 points 5 months ago

Genuine question, what are the alternatives not called Azure/GCP?