this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
26 points (90.6% liked)

GenZedong

5178 readers
62 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What morality lies in bigotry? None. What morals exist in anti-bigotry? Every single one of them. When we experience bigotry, we know it’s wrong. To me, morality and bigotry are two opposites, and bigotry is wrong in both sense of the word, that is, as something illogical and immoral. We never say a racist man is moral, but is anti-racism moral in word or deed? Communists don’t just oppose racism in ideology; we act against it. Ours is a political movement, a fight against oppression. Thus, the answer is self-evident: No, we can’t be racist against whites. By virtue of our anti-racism being a political movement based on the liberation of the oppressed races, whites, as a race, are excluded from this anti-racism. When liberals claim “cracker” is a racist slur, they prove themselves to be crackers because only a cracker would take offense.

This post is mainly for liberals who sometimes visit lemmygrad, such as the community MeanwhileOnGrad

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 4 days ago

White supremacy amongst Imperial America’s institutions is a well documented phenomenon and you’ll have a hard time finding any social scientists denying its existence. You can’t just play Mad Libs by replacing ‘white’ with a minority and expect it to work perfectly. Example:

“But whites received on average 36 percent more callbacks to interview than African-Americans with equal job qualifications, and we found no evidence that this level of discrimination had changed.”

If you tried to make fun of this by writing ‘Blacks received on average 36 percent more callbacks to interview than Whites with equal job qualifications’, most people would rightfully look at you like you had just lost your godddamned mind. The old switcheroo simply does not work here, since it requires you to forget that reality exists.

This is why I get annoyed when somebody reacts to an insult to White men with ‘omg what if u said that about joos’ or ‘omg what if u said that about blacks’. An insult to White men isn’t like an insult to Jews or Black folk. It’s more like someone insulting ‘Aryans’ in the 1930s or 1940s. If you don’t believe me, look at how the Fascists reacted to Theodore N. Kaufman.

Now, if someone insulting Whites or men bums you out for a bit then I can understand that, but the correct approach is not to scold anybody or show them the ol’ switcheroo. That isn’t going to fix the situation. It’ll probably only make things worse, if anything.