this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
26 points (90.6% liked)

GenZedong

5178 readers
62 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What morality lies in bigotry? None. What morals exist in anti-bigotry? Every single one of them. When we experience bigotry, we know it’s wrong. To me, morality and bigotry are two opposites, and bigotry is wrong in both sense of the word, that is, as something illogical and immoral. We never say a racist man is moral, but is anti-racism moral in word or deed? Communists don’t just oppose racism in ideology; we act against it. Ours is a political movement, a fight against oppression. Thus, the answer is self-evident: No, we can’t be racist against whites. By virtue of our anti-racism being a political movement based on the liberation of the oppressed races, whites, as a race, are excluded from this anti-racism. When liberals claim “cracker” is a racist slur, they prove themselves to be crackers because only a cracker would take offense.

This post is mainly for liberals who sometimes visit lemmygrad, such as the community MeanwhileOnGrad

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] opiumfree@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 days ago

”white” denotes more or less the people who dont experience racism, those who are at the highest point of racial hierarchy.

slavs, jews etc. are in many contexts not considered ”white”

many middle eastern populations are ”white”. syria has more people with blonde hair and blue eyes than france does. however, theyre not considered ”white”.

”white” does not mean someone of european ancestry with fair skin.

there is a big debate of east asian people being ”white” in some contexts. many east asian countries are prosperous. because these populations are prosperous, or very capitalistic, some people go as far to consider them honorary white.