this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
203 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55796 readers
2101 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Google, Youtube and Facebook all forced real usernames for a time and it made no difference to the quality of conversation or how toxic it was. Indeed many people on Twitter/X use their real names and say some truly awful things.

Its not about anonymity, the real answer to getting less toxicity is good moderators that care about the subject matter. Its why Reddit is a mixed bag depending on the sub you are in, all depends on the moderators. If you want to fix social medias toxic name calling and everything else you should be forcing Facebook et el to have enough moderators to actually do the job well with interest in the various sub topics.

[–] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

We fucking don't care about how toxic it is. If you find a social network toxic just leave it or ban people you find toxic. Nobody force you to stay.

Moderation means no impartiality, no free speech and less liberty.

BUT social networks can be useful for many people like winsleblowers for example, and they NEED to stay anonymous. If some people are agree to sacrifice their anonymity others really need it.

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google, Youtube and Facebook all forced real usernames for a time

They did? Haven't created a Google accouts in years.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

At one point after Google bought YouTube, I signed into YT and was horrified to find that my username was replaced with my real name. I hadn’t been asked or alerted to a change, it was rolled out silently. I changed it back immediately, because holy shit that’s invasive. But yes, Google/YouTube forced real names (at least at that point in time.)