this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
343 points (98.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54159 readers
428 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The first Jurassic Park movie is all time one of the greatest films ever made with the special effects still holding up to this day. The 2nd film was still very enjoyable in my opinion but it was just a cookie cutter sequel not bad, not good. The 3rd film wasnโ€™t great at all. But compared to the rest of the series the 3rd film is basically the godfather.

As another personal pick the 1st blade movie is a hood classic good. The other 2 not so much.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I can respect the fourth one. Sure, it was a terrible movie but it feels like a deliberate piss take on the idea of reviving the franchise. And I can respect that.

[โ€“] bungusbread@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Eh. A bad movie is a bad movie, regardless of what the footnotes say.

[โ€“] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I said I can respect it, not that it's good. It feels like a deliberate attempt to torpedo the revival of a series that really didn't need to be revived. That's what I can respect, not the movie on its own merits.

[โ€“] yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking that. It was so bad, so so bad... But yeah I couldn't help but feel the wachowski sister that did it (if I'm not wrong the other one didn't participate) just dit it to spite the studio for trying to make a moneygrab movie.

Having said that, despite the 2nd and 3rd movies not being great by any means compared to the first one, I do still enjoy them, like a guilty pleasure kinda thing.

[โ€“] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IIRC in the first half hour they explicitly shit talk the execs wanting a sequel so it's quite obvious it's a middle finger to Warner bros.

[โ€“] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago

Personally I was surprised that they even allowed it since it was so explicit about it. Lol

The 2nd and 3rd ones are still fun, action-packed movies with ground-breaking effects. The Matrix set an impossibly high bar and it was not originally planned to be a sequel, let alone a trilogy. They also whipped them together much faster, so in that context, I think they did a great job.

[โ€“] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Huh. Douglas Adams did something similar when his publisher kept pressuring him to make another Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy book.
"STOP MAKING ME WRITE THESE"

[โ€“] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[โ€“] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 1 day ago

unfortunately, yes.

[โ€“] No1@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Friend, let me save you a couple of hours and a lot of pain.

There are only 3.

[โ€“] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Literally.

The first thing I thought after I finished watching the 4th one, was that it didn't happen.