Humane Foreign Policy - Kat for Illinois
As with regard to Taiwan, the United States must continue to support Taiwan in the face of increasing Chinese aggression and attempts to undermine Taiwan’s internationally recognized status as a state of its own.
Kat Abughazaleh, Democratic candidate for Illinois 9th Congressional District - Chicago Sun-Times
I want to codify passive support to sell Taiwan weapons, and prevent the president from overruling it unilaterally. If China invades Taiwan, we need to step in militarily to defend Taiwan. We have to use all our assets in the region, to defend the island from illegal aggression. I envision a two-part credible deterrence plan that turns Taiwan into a “porcupine” too costly for the PRC to invade, by providing them with weapons to defend themselves and committing to actually defending the island if they do invade.
Drop Site (@DropSiteNews): "⭕️ LEAKED Email | XCancel
“interventionist,” foreign policy adviser says Kat Abughazaleh, a socialist Democratic candidate in Illinois’ 9th District and one of the only Palestinian-Americans seeking office in 2026, was described by her national security adviser as “firmly an interventionist” who “won’t stop until Russia is made to pay for its crimes,” in written responses detailing her foreign policy vision, obtained by Drop Site.
Ben Mermel wrote in an email to a Washington-based progressive foreign policy activist that Abughazaleh believes “the world is better off when America takes a leading role” and that the U.S. has “an obligation to support pro-democracy movements around the world, from Iran to Venezuela.” He added that “Kat wholly supports the National Endowment for Democracy, as well as its affiliated organizations (NDI, IRI, and the AFL-CIO’s Solidarity Center),” and said Congress should expand tools “from sanctions to NGO support” to advance those efforts without always resorting to “kinetic force.”
The DC-based activist had written to Mermel saying he had noticed unusually hawkish language on the campaign website related to Ukraine and Taiwan and was looking for clarification.
In his response, Mermel said that on Taiwan she would amend the Taiwan Relations Act by “dropping our strategic ambiguity” and make clear the U.S. would counter Chinese aggression “with force,” arguing the region now requires “a firmer hand.”
On Ukraine, Mermel wrote she would “hold the line,” support “funding the Ukrainian war effort to the hilt,” back long-range strikes on Russian strategic targets, deploy additional U.S. “air, naval, and ground assets” to NATO’s front line, and that “She supports the seizure and redistribution of Russian assets in Europe and the United States, for the purpose of financing the war effort.”
Abughazaleh did not respond to a request for comment, but a source close to the campaign told Drop Site that the adviser’s email did not accurately represent her views, saying, “Kat is committed to taking on authoritarianism but is vehemently against the military industrial complex and the continuation of failed US intervention approaches.” Abughazaleh has consistently argued against U.S. support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza and, at a recent forum, said she opposes U.S. strikes on Iran.
Mermel in 2024 attended a pro-Israel protest held to counter the encampment at George Washington University. He has been Abughazaleh’s National Security Adviser since July 2025, according to Legistorm.
Just for the record, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a CIA organization:
National Endowment for Democracy - Wikipedia
In a 1991 interview with the Washington Post, NED founder Allen Weinstein said: "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."[24]
The People’s Forum is WHOLLY funded, staffed, and controlled by PSL, whose office is in the same building upstairs. (more below and in linked tweet)
She wants a hot war with China over Taiwan, wants to codify arms sales to Taiwan and is against the axis of resistance and wants the state department and NED to rebuild Gaza. She’s a lib
Here's the thing: It is certainly possible PSL is being another western failure, but we need evidence for that. Why would her campaign website be posting something like what I quoted if she fully embraces imperialist views? Why would she do her career this way when she could just run as a dem and be openly imperialist? I suppose it's possible she's going for some kind of controlled opposition thing, but like, the Chicago Sun-Times source is not exactly hiding things.
It's strange. Simply repeating what you already have said about her in other words doesn't clarify what's going on here.
It's called pinkwashing imperialism. Promise "progressive" policies at home but support imperialist propaganda and imperialist intervention abroad. Now with the enormous popularity of pro-Palestine views in the younger generations you can also add superficial pro-Palestinian rhetoric to that as well. This is a rug pull tactic. And the way you know it's a rug pull tactic and that these candidates will turn into libs once they actually get into power, like AOC, Mamdani, etc. is because aligning with imperialist foreign policy objectives is the canary in the coal mine of fake progressivism.
I'm aware of the concept. But each time it is suspected to happen, it still requires investigation to better understand what is going on and the relationships involved. Especially when we're talking about accusing a whole party (PSL) which appears to generally take an anti-imperialist stance, of platforming an imperialist. What is the rush to conclude and put it in a generalized box immediately? It is a serious accusation being made by this thread that goes beyond one person running for election.
I'm not accusing PSL, i'm accusing Kat. I think PSL is just making a really bad mistake misjudging who she is.
Well hopefully more information will come out as time goes on and PSL will do their own investigation. I'm just hesitant on the reactive nature of this stuff. Whether it's an individual playing games with ideology, or an entire party being controlled opposition, I want us to be able to present evidence for it cleanly in a way that removes as much doubt as possible. I guess it's one of the reasons I hate bougie elections, because when this kind of stuff comes out, it often gets presented like a clock ticking down kind of thing. Like "now you know the truth... before time is up and it's too late to turn back."
At this point, I feel like people trying to get elected in empire countries need to prove their dedication to anti-imperialism with more than words and otherwise assume they're untrustworthy, but if they did prove it well, the establishment would probably go out of its way to make sure they never get elected. So it's kind of a wash.