this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
625 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
84668 readers
4507 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Apple in shambles
Macs have had USB-C charging since 2015.
This was, in many respects, a downgrade, since Apple's proprietary MagSafe was seen by many as a valuable feature. Power cords that pop out rather than yanking the laptop off the desk if someone trips over it are pretty handy.
In 2021 Apple started re-including MagSafe on their laptops. But since doing so, the USB-C ports have also been able to charge the laptop.
So since 2015 they've been compliant with this law, and since 2021 they've had the best of both worlds, with either option working.
I wouldn't mind a USB-C sub type that works like that, just the connector is yankable like that, yet it's pure USB-C and fucking compatible
Because if you think that Apple added this port just and only because of the yankable cable, and not to again be purposely be incompatible so they can squeeze more money out of you, then I have a bridge to sell you...
Usb c adapters like that exists
https://www.amazon.com/Magtame/dp/B0DM5HGC5H?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&psc=1
I'd be surprised if they followed the USB standards properly. I've had two kinds of these before, and they were sketchy at best, not offering the advertised data and power rates, nor working properly with custom firmware keyboards and KVMs.
Why would they deliberately leave the ability to charge via USB-C, if that were the case?
I hope that bridge is going cheap.
Ah ok, I thought they were tied to magsafe
My MacBook Air has MagSafe, and I love it. I sometimes charge with USB-C, but very, very rarely. Not least because it only has two USB sockets.
Iphones still using usb2 over usbc
Apple was one of the co developers of USB C.
Anything but