this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
254 points (98.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39494 readers
1797 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the Lord of the Rings fandom there's a persistent debate whether balrogs, or Durin's Bane specifically, have wings. The text in Fellowship is ambiguous whether what it is describing are literal wings or something else wing-like.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AstroLightz@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Programming and Linux. Oh boy, what to pick...

Terminal text editors: VIM vs Emacs is the main debate there. (There are others but these are ones people argue the most about)

Linux Distros: Arch, Debian, Mint, CachyOS, ...

Init Systems: Systemd vs OpenRC. Honestly, probably the most toxic debate on this list.

Programming Languages: Python, Shell, but the heated one is C vs Rust

A non-exhaustive list of ones I couldn't think of a category for:

  • Tiling vs Floating Window Managers
  • Chromium vs Gecko-based browsers
  • Bash vs Zsh vs Fish

I love computers and Linux, but man, the amount of toxic in-fighting and gatekeeping is a real turnoff. Just use what you want. At the end of the day, we are all nerds doing what we love.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am team...

  • Nano

  • Arch

  • Systemd, I don't see what the fuss is about that TBH

  • I don't wanna even touch that one lol

  • I like the carousel kind of things like Karousel or Niri

  • Gecko (Librewolf, Floorp etc.)

  • Zsh

But yeah I agree, everyone should just do what they want. Having lots of options is one of my favourite things about Linux.

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

heretic! the only dogmatically correct setup is

  • helix
  • fedora
  • systemd
  • rust
  • whatever fits your workflow
  • gecko
  • nushell

neovim, opensuse tumbleweed, idk, idk, floating, gecko, bash

my experience is limited tho, and im not strongly opinionated

i like the vi/vim/neovim editor control scheme, not tried much else, nano seems ok too from my occasional use of it

i use opensuse tumbleweed because its rolling release but still pretty stable and installation is easy but allows a lot of customizing, many other distros are good for many other things too, fedora popos and mint are great easy desktops, debian and nixos are great for servers, arch gentoo void nixos and artix are great desktops for nerds, etc. the bad ones are ubuntu (canonical is weird and corporate and makes bad decisions), manjaro (the devs are incompetent), and omarchy (it preinstalls nonfree software (including nordvpn (ew)), ai, and more nonfree software (including chatgpt (even more ai ew) and twitter))(as you might be able to tell i really hate it, its just an installer for some moron's desktop setup, thats what nixos is for you fucking twat, and its crappily opinionated with crappy opinions)

ive only used systemd distros (opensuse, ubuntu, fedora, debian, raspbian) so idk whether systemd alternatives are better, i just know that systemd is pretty bad in many ways

and im not that much of a programmer, but pretty much all languages are good and useful (except that javascript is useful but not good)

i like floating wms (i use kde plasma) because tiling is a bit annoying (sometimes i want a window to be a particular shape) and because tiling is usually in wms that are not des, ive tried sway and hyprland and the mostly keyboard based control was nice but it not being a de that provides all of that useful stuff was annoying

gecko is better because its more libre, the corporation behind it is dedicated to libre rather than being one of the world's biggest and evilest megacorps, and it incorporates more pro privacy design. i use librewolf. gecko is poorly separated from firefox tho so im quite hopeful for servo engine now that ladybird is vibe coded slop being rewritten in rust by the cult

i like bash because its the typical well known linux shell that many online resources are about

[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And heaven forbid you actually prefer Windows

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 days ago

actually prefer Windows

I don't understand. I recognize the words, but in that order, they make no sense.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nobody prefers Windows. Some people used to prefer the software suites exclusive to Windows.

[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

~~Nobody~~most people on Lemmy don't prefers Windows. FTFY

Linux users need to stop assuming everyone is wrong for needing things that Linux can't do at all or doesn't do well. I need accessibility. Linux doesn't do it well. Over a decade and a half of trying to make it work has proven that. Some people need Adobe or MS Office (even though many may not like it), and Linux doesn't do that at all. They're not wrong, their needs differ from yours.

And it doesn't matter whose "fault" it is. Apple fanboys do this, too. If an OS doesn't offer something you need, that's where the conversation ends. They don't care what internal politics at the vendor or lack of community interest by Linux devs or whatever lead to the thing they need not working. All they care about is that it doesn't work.

And no, they're not going to take night classes to get a comp-sci degree so they can code the drivers that their peripheral needs.

"What's that, you need a claw hammer but I gave you a ball peen hammer? Pfffft, just become a blacksmith and forge your own hammerhead, it's not THAT hard." --Every Linux user

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I prefer Windows. Every experience I've had with Linux has been a nightmare.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago

Microsoft's helping our case by blasting their own foot all the time, fortunately.