this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
254 points (98.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39494 readers
1797 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the Lord of the Rings fandom there's a persistent debate whether balrogs, or Durin's Bane specifically, have wings. The text in Fellowship is ambiguous whether what it is describing are literal wings or something else wing-like.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uggggh... I only watched the 13th doctor episodes a couple of years ago to catch up to David Tennant's return and I totally forgot about all that... I don't mind weird 'missing' incarnations like the war doctor and even the one at the lighthouse had she either fit in or was ambiguous as to what 'number' they are but yeah, the timeless child stuff was awful and weird and just made the doctor feel so hollow... Instead of being this flawed character trying to do good they suddenly are important in the universe because of their nature and not their deeds... It cheapens the doctor so much... Can we not just pretend that 13 never happened? I'm still yet to watch the 15th doctor series because of how awful the Chibnell era was...

I very much enjoyed the 5 hour video by Jay Exci on it because it really showed how poor it really was. I was never that keen on some of the Moffat era when he got too Moffat-y for his own good but I would have had that in a heartbeat.

[โ€“] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

It's such a shame because I really like Jodie Whittaker as the Doctor, but yeah her whole era was so badly written. She's doing Big Finish now though so hopefully she'll get some good stuff to work with there.

The 15th Doctor era is.. odd. No spoilers but RTD is back as lead writer but he makes some.... decisions lol. Including putting one of the worst episodes the show has ever had right at the start of 15's run. You'll probably know it when it happens! But then inbetween the oddness there are some genuinely really good single episodes too IMO.