this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
7 points (88.9% liked)

Asklemmy

54273 readers
526 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anger is a composite emotion that is the combination of several emotions, a blend of a brief period of time and social conditioning. It is not pure.

The root of all anger is typically sadness, or fear. It's been well studied that in the US, boys are taught from an early age to "man up", "quit being a sissy" and other silly things after they show an emotional response. Boys don't cry, boys are tough. Showing sadness or fear is a sign of weakness. So boys (and girls also) are taught and the lesson is reinforced when they are made fun of for being sad or fearful. They are also taught that where sadness is weakness, anger is strength. If something bad happens to you, crying is passive, submissive and everyone hates a pussy. When you get angry, you take action, you hit things, break things, hit people, lash out verbally, curse, call them mean things. Now others are scared of you or at least unwilling to engage--this is now control and control is a means to taking power.

Anger is learned, it is taught. It is not an instinct. Anger is not required to respond under duress. In a fight or flight situation, neither require anger. You can be scared and still fight. Anger is just what we are taught by a culture that prizes power and strength to be required in order to fight.

[โ€“] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How does fight not require anger like if you're not necessarily afraid of whatever the stimulus but you're annoyed or contemptuous of it encroaching on you?

I feel like I can be pissed about something without necessarily feeling "sad" or "fearful". Its more of a "lets nip this in the bud now so it doesnt fuck with me again"