this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
728 points (96.7% liked)

Selfhosted

56957 readers
1078 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] little_tuptup@sh.itjust.works 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Projects like Plex, they started out from the open source community, had free contributions, and then monetized. People are bastardizing open source.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The reason Plex is as popular as it is is because of their infrastructure and software that lets users stream video and music remotely on any device at the press of a button. That costs money to build and maintain.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 55 minutes ago

It certainly doesn't cost what they're charging. They have a cache, a relay and an auth service. I'll grant them some more allowance for an active security team. They've wasted manyears on features nobody wants and have eliminated any feature that costs them any amount of money to maintain if they can't make money off it. (sync, client serve, yada yada)

[–] FaygoBoozer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Really? Cuz Jellyfin literally does the same thing and doesn't cost money.

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Jellyfin does not handle NAT punching automatically to point that a non technical user can install an app on their TV, see one or more libraries, and connect to my server across the Internet. This is the biggest problem that Plex solves compared to Jellyfin. I can't expect my parents to install Tailscale or make any changes to their network.

That being said I use Jellyfin. I just don't share it with my friends.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 hours ago

Really? Because folders on a hard drive and the OS's networking does all that... what am I missing?