this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4631 readers
914 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/46795143

Videos from a 30 October 2025 operation were disclosed in court as part of an ongoing class-action lawsuit challenging Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) arrest tactics and racial profiling by agents. Lawyers for one of the detained farm workers shared the footage with the Guardian.

The officers did not have warrants to detain the workers, and a federal judge later said the arrests appeared to be unlawful and unjustified.

The footage shows an agent using his phone to capture the face of one of the detained workers, and agents later admitted in court that they used a facial recognition app during the operation. The case provides a window into ICE’s expanding use of this surveillance technology across the US, which has raised significant privacy and civil liberties concerns, particularly since the app can yield inaccurate results.

...

US judge Mustafa Kasubhai ruled against ICE in February in the class-action suit led by MJMA. He said officers had engaged in “misconduct” in Oregon and issued a preliminary decision broadly restricting agents in the state from arresting people without warrants.

Kasubhai noted that officers had made inaccurate statements in their reports about the Woodburn encounter, including falsely saying MJMA had entered the US unlawfully when she had arrived with a valid temporary visa. He said the claims of possible “smuggling” were “unfounded”, and noted that ICE’s reports inaccurately called the stop “consensual”.

The judge was also critical of the officers’ use of the facial recognition technology, saying it relied on data that “can be inaccurate and produce individuals who are here in accordance with immigration laws”.

The judge further said that in the Woodburn stop, officers “did not provide any meaningfully reasonable time for the driver to comply with his commands before shattering the driver side window”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My money is on they all have a presidential pardon in their desks already, upon hire. I think that’s how you get this bold about breaking laws and shooting people.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 36 minutes ago

While it's possible, I'm unsure someone cares about them without any profits incentitive. You can see January coupers being forgiven as a fact against that, but I see it as a timely promo campaign for future hirings. Most of usual MAGA scam schemes, e.g. Trump phone, were and are about grabbing the bag and run. I see ICE as a rhyme to nazi SA who got thrown under the bus once inconvinient. We'd see how and if they are important once other divisions of federal government start to properly bash them, bringing up the question of droping/keeping them.