this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
153 points (96.9% liked)
Privacy
5682 readers
190 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have it, I use it, I like it. I love not seeing ads, I love getting more independent results like blogs, I love getting tailored websites based on my own design (meaning i personally flagged things for more or less weight in the Algo).
I'm aware they're not as privacy focused as they claim to me. I'm aware the founder is a bit weird and that they have some AI components. Right now id rather pay them $100 bucks a year than give that same amount to Google via ads, and most importantly protecting my information sphere.
If there was a better paid option I'd consider switching. I'm not convinced SearX or whatever it is is worth the effort, so Kagi I remain.
+1 to everything this guy said for me as well.
I'll add that I think the price is probably too high for what I use, but it's still worth it to not use Google.
this is my exact experience / opinion. i've tried many other search options (ddg, ecosia, startpage, yandex, &utm=14, my own searX instance) and none of them gave me the same user experience as kagi.
try out the lowest tier like i did and see how those first few hundred searches work out for you, if you're in doubt.
Does it have decent reverse image search? Nothing I've tried is as good as Google reverse image search used to be.