Linux

13986 readers

484 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

351

Flathub Now Rejects AI-Assisted Apps and Submissions (linuxiac.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Really? Llm code can not confirm to open source licences.

[–] troed@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's my personal view as well and so all apps I write are "licensed" as CC0. Other maintainers are taking a different view.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Citation needed, I've never heard that before and I'm seeing plenty of evidence of people behaving otherwise.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I thought llm code was all public domain? Which I guess that means it can't be under an open source license.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

a project not lines of code. you cant license a fully 100% vibe coded app but adding a function to a project doesnt invalidate a whole project

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 2 weeks ago

And even if it was 100% vibe coded, how could one tell? The code has never been published before so there's no way to determine its origin.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -3 points 2 weeks ago

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is based off of public domain sources but it is nevertheless under copyright itself. So even if the output of LLMs was public domain (not something that has been clearly or universally established) that doesn't mean a project incorporating it would have to be. Public domain is not "viral."