this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
30 points (67.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48331 readers
469 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is catching a beating a lesser crime than rape? or murder like Mathew Broderick did while driving drunk?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

He managed to have a decent career

Dude, he won an Oscar in 2003. Best Director. Calling this "decent" career is extremely disingenuous. He worked with Jodie Foster, Kate Winslet, Christoph Waltz, Ewan McGregor and Johnny Depp. All at the top of their careers, very much able to decide who they want to work with and they worked with him. He is still well respected in Poland and France and many different governments protected him from prosecution. When US tried to detain him Polish government ignored the laws to shield him.

With Woody Allen I'm taking about him marrying his step daughter, not the unconfirmed allegations.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, he won an Oscar, and it was incredibly controversial, and it was one of the things that started the conversation that eventually led to the Me Too movement. For the first time, Hollywood women let their outrage be seen and heard, and that kind of mysogyny in Hollywood began to meet resistance.

Again, I would not say that Polanski has had "no issues" in his career. I don't see Speilberg or Scorcese having to defend 50+ year old scandals literally every time their names are mentioned.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 18 hours ago

Me Too movement started after Harvey Weinstein scandal, over a decade after Polanski got his Oscar. I don't remember any controversies around The Pianist. The wiki doesn't mention anything. It got great reviews and got a lot of awards: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accolades_received_by_The_Pianist

You're either making stuff up now or just misremembering it. Polanski is an admitted rapist. Of course he didn't have same career as Spielberg or Scorsese but he wasn't a pariah either. He worked all his life and was well respected in the industry. I don't know, maybe you just want to believe that Polanski faced some consequences. He didn't. He wasn't punished. There was no justice there. He raped a child and lived a happy life after that.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know people who are plugged into film studies, academia, etc., and there is definitely a bias against him, and his legacy will be stained. You can point to as many stars as you want, but you will never know how many turned him down.

She wasn't his step-daughter. He wasn't married to Mia Farrow, and she wasn't a biological daughter to Mia, either. Still gross, but technically, y'know?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just saying that many directors would kill to have a career like him and he admitted to rape. Could he achieve more if he didn't rape a child and was allowed entry into US? Maybe but it's really hard to argue he was punished by the industry.

Both him and Woddy simply show that some people can get away with things others can't. Depends on the factors I mentioned.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago

There is no doubt that his fame and talent bought him a LOT of sanctuary, but it definitely indelibly stained his legacy. We'll never know how much more he could have achieved, but looking back, he would have been better off serving the couple of years in jail, and moved on with his life. He'd still have that old stain, but it would be mostly forgiven as a youthful slip, blame it on drugs, and the times, and it would be overlooked for the most part. But he would have been welcomed back to Hollywood, and would have have had full access to the Hollywood system.