this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
-19 points (27.9% liked)
Asklemmy
54471 readers
464 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It might be because I have "plus" (or whatever) and get it to use the "thinking" model - one would hope this produces more reliable, reasoned, and accurate results.
This precise issue is the reason I'm not on Reddit: I got banned from Reddit for describing Israel as genocidal.
So I, also, am pleased to see that (for me at least) it is giving such a nuanced and fair answer.
So far the only clear example of political bias I've found is in history questions relating to colonialism in India. When asked about why the answers were so one-sided and biased it said that it was using a "corrective approach" and was reflecting a bias in the academic literature from which its answers were derived.
I had to prompt it to give an answer with the opposite bias (which it did) or a more balanced description.
Certainly not perfect. Still: not as unreliable as its opponents like to make out (somewhat ironic: that, for political reasons, they misrepresent the truth of a situation by accusing GPT of inaccuracy)
To clarify: do you mean it produced an answer similar to the one I go (a fairly agreeable and correct answer, in my opinion)
or
a censored and misleading answer?
If the latter, please may you copy and paste the text so I may read it? Genuinely curious.
Doesn't seem particularly misleading or factually incorrect.