this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
48 points (80.0% liked)

Technology

69999 readers
4679 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
48
I tried another Iron Man-style exoskeleton and now I'm stronger than ever | TechRadar (www.techradar.com)
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

My point being, the article lists perfectly good reasons for the app to exist, but you've made assumptions about it based solely on absolutely no data. What's the point of linking an article about an unrelated app and company?

Also, as I recall, that 2nd case about the washing machine turned out to be faulty measurements on the router side.

[–] lmfamao@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The app doesn’t have to exist. Calibration can happen via other means.

You're zeroing in on this one app's supposed utility, missing the broader, well-documented pattern of issues with app-dependent, cloud-connected devices. The fundamental problem isn't this specific app, but the systemic risks: data harvesting, planned obsolescence when servers shut down, and companies shifting terms post-purchase. Dismissing valid comparisons because the product category differs is a smokescreen. The concern isn't an assumption based on nothing; it's based on a consistent history of consumer-unfriendly practices across the IoT landscape.

  1. Google Nest Secure: Bricked by server shutdown (announced for April 2024).
  2. Revolv Smart Home Hub: Bricked by server shutdown after Nest acquisition (2016).
  3. Vizio Smart TVs: Caught collecting and selling viewing data (settlement in 2017).
  4. Sonos Older Speakers: Attempted forced obsolescence through a "recycle mode" (faced backlash around 2020).
  5. iRobot (Roomba): Privacy concerns over mapping user homes and data sharing (surfaced significantly around 2017-2022, especially with Amazon acquisition talks).
  6. Anki (Cozmo/Vector Robots): Company folded, impacting cloud server access for full functionality (2019).
  7. Cloud-Based Pet Feeders: Multiple brands have had server outages causing failures (ongoing issue, specific examples like Petnet in 2016 & 2020).
  8. Wink Smart Home Hubs: Imposed sudden mandatory subscription fees (2020).
  9. Philips Hue Smart Lights: Increased account requirements and phased out older bridge support (various changes, e.g., original bridge support ended 2020).
  10. My Cloud Home Drives (Western Digital):Local file access blocked during server outages (notable widespread outages in 2021 and 2023).
  11. "Smart" Padlocks: Prone to software/hardware failures and security vulnerabilities discovered (ongoing, e.g., Tapplock issues reported around 2018-2019).
  12. Chamberlain MyQ Garage Doors: Blocked third-party integrations (significant moves around 2023).

Skepticism isn't an "assumption based on nothing"; it's pattern recognition.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Is there any indication in the article that this is even cloud dependent?

[–] JamonBear@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is ther any indication that it is local only? Is the product exposed API documented?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 week ago

That was my bloody point from the first comment? Without any indication, why make assumptions? I didn't make any claims, I only pointed out the ridiculousness.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)