this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
418 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

48886 readers
1004 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello people, my family recently bought a Renault 5 e-tech. The car itself is great, but there are some aspects that creep me out, especially the driver-facing camera. We didn't actually know that such a camera existed before we bought the car, it was only mentioned as the car was given to us.

The cameras official purpose is to see, if you are tired and paying attention to the road, by some "AI magic", I suppose. You can also let it scan your face, so that you automatically get logged into your profile.

I personally think, that that is kinda creepy, especially as there is no visual indication if the camera is currently recording and no official way to disable the camera hardware-wise. When it is being coverd, the car immediately complains about it.

When talking to friends or family about it, I got one of two reactions: equal concern, or "nice feature actually", "what about the camera on your laptop?", "you are way too paranoid", "I have noting to hide; it is only me driving being recorded".

I have also seen such cameras in other cars, BYD for example.

What do you think, is this creepy or am I too paranoid? Does anyone know where the actual data is processed, on device or on some cloud server? Do you have any experience with such cameras? I couldn't really find any information about it on the internet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think the US government thinks it is, IIRC there's an upcoming regulation in 2027 for that

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

The libertarians are finally starting to make sense.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.zip 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Want the good bits of "libertarianism" with internal consistency and a liberatory framework? Have I got the ideology for you!

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Anarchism might be a bit too extreme for my taste

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.zip 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Its not that extreme when you look into it, but I get it. Anarchism has a lot of negative connotations, but It's fundamentally an acknowledgement that hierarchy is the common thread that connects all oppressive structures (capitalism, racism, patriarchy, homophobia, transphobia, nationalism, the state, etc). As such, if we want to be free from oppression we should be dismantling hierarchies by whatever means necessary, so long as those means are compatible with our ends. This could look like the anarchist of days past, sabotaging factories, killing union busters, and assassinating kings. But it also looks like starting community gardens, running food shares, setting up free stores, tool libraries, and time banks. There's a million ways to be an anarchist, and very few of them involve bombs

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

While I oppose all oppressive structures mentioned, how is hierarchy inherently oppressive?

Also, I definitely support serving the community through actions such as those you mentioned.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

most hierarchies are not consensual.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Is it fair for me to expect companies or political parties to be non hierarchical?

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Libertarians would only care if the industry said they didn't want it. But manufacturers are all lock step in favor of these regulations.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Exactly. The big manufacturers love stuff like this. The more mandatory features, the harder it is for new car manufacturers to enter the market. Back in the day, guys like Ford started out by selling cars they built out of their garages. Ford was built by starting in a garage and plowing the profits back into the business over decades. But modern cars are just too complex to build that way.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah that's the problem, they make just enough sense that you can squint at it and think they're fine. I have a number of relatively intelligent acquaintances that are full on libertarian without having any idea it's a political pyramid scheme until you start having them dissect it and explain the parts on who gets to decide what gets pair for.