this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
425 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4270 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Fuck these incompetent headline writers who cant use units correctly. At this point they are doing this shit on purpose to ragebait people into reading the article. And they dont even explain what that headline is supposed to mean in the article. Does the output power ramp up that fast or do they mean that it can actually just output a lot of energy really fast?

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Actually, the headline isn't wrong, you just read it wrong.

The article specifies:

  • 2.1 GWh total storage capacity
  • 1.2 GW peak output
  • can ramp up to that peak output within milliseconds

Every power source has a ramp up time. Ramping up e.g. a nuclear reactor can take hours, so if demand fluctuates it takes long for it to spin up.

This one here can ramp up almost instantly to cover for fluctuations in the network, especially those caused by the unpredictable nature of renewable power generators.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I am also fascinated by the measurement “two soccer fields.” Americans largely play soccer on American football fields, so any American would just say “two football fields.” But everyone else hates calling it “soccer” and prefer to use metric rather than comparisons? This just seems like they chose all their measurements to be maximally irritating.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah, nobody play soccer in Switzerland, they play football, how would they know how big is soccer field?

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Calling it two football field would still work. Americans would think brown oblong ball field, everyone else would think black and white orb game. In in all cases they'd be thinking of essentially the same measurement.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 6 points 1 day ago

Right?! It’s just so puzzling a choice.

[–] banause@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's exactly what the original comment said?

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I think it was alluding to it, but stopped short of explicitly saying it. I felt it was worth explicitly saying.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Aren't soccer fields like 20% larger usually?

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because main concern when using soccer/football fields as measurement is accuracy

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Its as precise as a banana

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yeah. A lot of USLW games are played in gridiron stadiums, and the touchline is way further out than the sideline. They’re not required to be strictly uniform like gridiron, though, it’s more like a baseball diamond in that regard, so I’m not sure if they’re strictly wider, or just usually wider.

[–] Unleaded8163@fedia.io 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My interpretation is that it can go from no output up to 1.2GW in milliseconds. Do most big batteries take more time to ramp up to high output?

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

These systems support a latent load so it’s not all at once. Something like this but at a massive scale.

https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva670a/slva670a.pdf

Very cool engineering.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yep! In just 86500000 milliseconds. 🫡