this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
490 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

86896 readers
3942 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don't think I understand any better what the battery is then I did before. As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don't actually already understand.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Here's the short version.

A normal battery is a sealed cell. It has a positive and negative electrode, with an electrolyte between them. Usually many layers of this. When you charge it, a chemical change happens. When you discharge it, that chemical change is undone.

A redox flow battery uses fixed electrodes, but a liquid electrolyte that can be pumped and stored. This means you can increase overall storage capacity simply by adding more electrolyte tanks, without needing more electrodes. Think of it like a generator with a bigger gas tank.

The whole vanadium thing is just one of the metals used in the battery. There's a few kind of redox flow batteries using different chemistries

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Also there are hundreds of chemical combinations that produce electricity that we know about, and only a handful have been worked on for batteries. As reported in Harper's Magazine many years back, that is not indexed to enshitified search engines, because fuck you (us, google, et al talking.)

[–] jakobmn@feddit.dk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thank you! That is a smart solution to inrease capacity!

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The downside is that does batteries are not be energy dense. Perfect for grid storage but useless for car batteries (where the bulk of battery R&D money goes).

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fry: I get it! So if the simplified bucket explanation gets full, you just add more buckets!

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

Yes exactly. If you need more total capacity you add more tanks, if you need more instantaneous output power you add more electrodes. And thus you can scale either one without messing with the other.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah wikipedia is hit or miss, especially as technical people like to show off their fancy words and explain things in ways only technical people understand.

But it's Vanadium, and you can look that up elsewhere. The first large industrial vanadium battery (if I recall,) was some years back, I think in WA State.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If I really want to feel stupid, I go to the Wikipedia article for some simple maths concept I thought I understood

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

oh yeah, i read up yesterday what a polynomial is. hah.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I think people who enjoy math and formulas and proofs also enjoy writing Wikipedia articles in the same way. I usually go to the Simple English Wikipedia for any math topics. And I got as far as calc 2 in college, so I'm no ignoramus.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

There is Wikipedia in Simple English, but they don't cover all topics.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

source: wikipedia (link above)

As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don’t actually already understand.

but it's true, i have encountered exactly this phenomenon many times :/