this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
555 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4082 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 105 points 1 day ago (5 children)

To date, I have not heard a single CEO talk about where the money will come from if no one is employed.

How can consumers consume if they don't have any money?

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

May as well asked who the slave owners sold to since so many in the South were enslaved.

The answer is the same. They sell to each other. We don’t get a cut. They dream of the day they actually get to have slaves again. Most of them don’t see us as people; they see us as things that siphon off money that needs to be in their pockets. Money we don’t deserve because we’re not rich.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

Hell, they would be even happier to ignore the 'rabble' altogether. You at least had to keep the slaves vaguely alive.

There's a reason Larry Ellison said ""Citizens will be on their best behavior, because we’re constantly recording and reporting everything that is going on", they want to contain the "unwanted" and keep them from being a risk while excluding them from the 'economy' to the extent feasible

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 47 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

that's for someone else to worry about.

Seriously if you talk to these people they live their lives financial quarter by quarter. there's no plan for 2+ years down the line, they can't think that far ahead. They're all like this. It's all about the now. make money now, release a product now, no future, no updates, now now now. This is why LLM's appeal so much to them, it can provide that "now" that they crave.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago

When there's a 20 million dollar golden parachute when fail why would you care about the next quarter...

[–] RepublicansAreEvil@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Exactly! In 2008 there was guys just blindly driving off the cliff huffing pure copium and greed.

[–] h54@programming.dev 35 points 1 day ago

Because these drug and AI addled idiots refuse to or can't think more than a quarter ahead at a time. As there are no consequences for the executive caste, why should they?

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's what the rich dickhead bunkers in remote locations are for, my friend.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently long as bots are buying from them they care. The goal is keep the stock in green Apparently they don't need consumers for that.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

But what happens to the physical products that are taking up stock in warehouses?

Or are they just digitizing everything to the point where bots are buying shit to optimize their functions so they can buy more digitized product?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

They would be happy to have a 'low volume, high value economy'. Only trinkets for them to trade among themselves at relatively high price, while they have no use for and therefore no interest in the bulk of the population. There is a reason they are very keen on surveillance and "law enforcement" because they think that might keep the rabble away from them cheaper than trying to appease the rabble.