this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)

Australia

5028 readers
249 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would anyone want the CGT discount removed from shares and other non-housing investments though? Those affect renters too. It’s just another tax grab on money that the government has no right to tax.

I’m fine with removing the discount on housing, but there’s no justifiable reason to remove it from everything else. If it’s about housing like they said, why does it apply to shares?

They’ve also done nothing to address the actual biggest issue - supply and demand. Nothing to increase supply, nothing to decrease demand.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How does CGT on shares and non housing investments affect renters?

Supply and demand are the confected excuses. We have plenty of available dwellings and the issue is access for low income earners (well any earner below middle class in some parts of the country) and that’s been created by these tax concessions and removal of public supply to those who don’t qualify for bank approval.

Like I said before, I’m happy with inquiry on shares and non housing investments. I don’t care if moneymakers want to make more money, just not on crucial services like housing, health and energy.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We have plenty of available dwellings

We don't though, not in the areas that people want/need to live. Most people can't just pack up their life and move 5 hours away because there are a lot more empty shitbox houses out in the sticks.

How does CGT on shares and non housing investments affect renters?

Are you asking me, or was that your attempt to explain how it does?

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We don’t though

Yeah we do. That’s easily looked up and found as well. In the needed areas too. Some are left vacant by investors.

The problem is access.

Are you…

Well, kind of, because they don’t really. Housing policy isn’t dependent on taxing investments elsewhere. If it’s anything like you offered trying to explain racism don’t bother.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 5 days ago

That’s easily looked up and found as well.

Show us then. Show me the thousands of vacant homes in inner city brisbane/melbourne/sydney.

Well, kind of, because they don’t really.

My point was that they don't, yet the government removed the CGT discount on shares and non housing investments while saying it was to help with house prices. They lied, as they always do.

If it’s anything like you offered trying to explain racism don’t bother.

I'm assuming you're the person that doesn't understand that making fun of identity politics and their love of stereotypes isn't racism?