this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1096 points (99.4% liked)

World News

56457 readers
2684 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 51 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Just look at the awful things a woman president will do.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Let's pretend the Queen of England didn't just finally fuck off or all the other female authoritarians/war criminals, let's remove her agency and attribute any good she does to being a woman.

It's more sexist than the implication itself.

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Margaret Thatcher was UK's Reagan. Everything she didn't ruin herself; she readied to be ruined later.

It wasn't because she was a woman. It was because she was a freaking neoliberal.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

It's also just really fucking annoying that this platitude comes up every time a headline is posted about a woman doing good, as if people are just incapable of thinking it through.

Neither Clinton nor Harris would have supported this, and in fact, they'd have told their rotating villains to oppose it and claimed powerlessness, as Dems always do. (Which is, in part, why they lost their elections.)

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

bUt SeXiSm

Okay, run an actual leftist woman and isolate the variables.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago

I personally think they care way more about losing money and influence than hating women.

The misogyny is just a side gig.