240
Pakistan to respond ‘forcefully’ to India’s ‘act of war’, says prime minister after attack – live
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
240 points (99.2% liked)
World News
35867 readers
599 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
India reusing the oldest false flag playbook in the world as an excuse to start a war.
I haven’t been paying attention. Is the militia attack on the resort the one that’s fake? Who’s saying that?
Blaming Pakistan for it without any evidence is most definitely fake. India is clearly looking for a reason to start a war.
Where was bin laden found ? Also India targeted only terrorist grounds.
India killed multiple children.
What were children doing in terrorist training camps? Who trafficked them there? Why does Pakistan government not know about the kids in terrorist camps?
Because they are not terrorist camps and India bombed civilians.
Ah, crazy Indian forces. They either bomb Pakistani forests, or civilians, never terrorist camps that they have intel on.
Perhaps Pakistan would like cooperate when Indian govt investigates it. Civilians, after all. Nothing sensitive?
Crazy Indians forces with the concentration camp in Kashmir which they promised autonomy and then unilaterally violated their promise.
Tourists of Pakistan always hear local fairy tales. But they can't tell the real status of Kashmir they have made 'azad' from India, anf then sold to China like a medieval feudal lord from Mohammad's era.
Can you respond to my claim is it true yes or no?
Instantly changing the subject when human rights violations are brought up reminds me of another Apartheid.
Which particular claim?
Did India Promise Kashmir autonomy and then unilaterally violated their promise yes or no?
Both India and Pakistan took away autonomy from all princely states under their control respective control. I don't see any reason to single out one Princely state.
If you have any logical principle which singles out Kashmir, but not any of the others, please state.
You seem to know awfully little about Kashmir for someone so willing to bat for the Indian government. Doing the both-sides thing like the other Apartheid defenders when getting called out.
What is article 370 and what happened in 2019?
You need to answer my preceding post if the pretense that this is a rational discussion from your side has to continue.
Straight up from Israel playbook, bomb stuff and declare them as terrorist facilities without a single piece of evidence.