this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
-24 points (29.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1779 readers
42 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

yeah i know JK Rowling has said and done awful things to the trans community, but you really shouldn't making posts wishing for their death or celebrating that you told them to suck on a shotgun. it's not productive and makes allies and the trans community look criminally derange.

the better thing to do is to promote the trans community and show trans are normal people that do fun things like drag shows.

yeah didn't i pissed off a mod so much that they banned me from other till a week later. also i think my bans are hilarious.

yeah talking about me getting banned always gets me hilarious reactions. but feel free to explain why i deserve it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This took place on a trans instance, that explicitly exists to provide a space for trans people that puts their needs and safety first. It has a zero tolerance policy for transphobia, for defending transphobes, for "just asking questions" transphobia etc.

And because of the nature of the fediverse, folk who don't want that experience have many other instances to choose from.

It's a specifically chosen and enforced policy.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Being opposed to telling transphobes to end their lives isn't transphobic.

Though I agree that migrating is the way to deal w unjustified bans.

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Being opposed to telling transphobes to end their lives isn’t transphobic

I'm not sure I understand how that relates to my comment?

I was addressing the bit where you framed a consistent and long standing instance policy as off the cuff, arbitrary moderation.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

It relates to your comment because, as you just said, you were addressing what you considered to be an instance policy.

The policy is on being a safe space for trans people and having zero tolerance for transphobia. Being a safe space for trans people ≠ being able to tell transphobes to end their lives.

Being against people telling transphobes to end their lives is not transphobia.

This is why it is indeed inappropriate moderation.

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The policy is on being a safe space for trans people and having zero tolerance for transphobia.

I also said it has a zero tolerance policy for defending transphobes, which is what got the OP pinged.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Saying nobody should tell anyone to end their life (transphobe or not) is NOT "defending transphobia".

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

Saying nobody should tell anyone to end their life (transphobe or not) is NOT “defending transphobia”.

Take a closer look at the mod log in question and have a look at what the OP actually said, and how they said it.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You should probably read the rest of their comments.

OP is full of shit.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. I'm just defending the part I think is reasonable (i.e. telling someone to end their lives isn't something that should be considered ok in any context).

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not going to advocate for saying it, but I'm also not going to pretend we aren't talking about a person actively advocating for the deaths of trans persons. So I'm also not going to pretend I'd be upset if Rowling slipped and killed herself instantly, or dropped a toaster into her bath because she somehow recognized how much of a deplorable piece of shit she is.

I'm also not going to defend OP for their actions here regardless of the potential intent behind a small fraction of the bigoted and ignorant comments they made. I would have banned them too.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Saying that is essentially the same as saying you want X person to end their life, so the difference is arbitrary.

I wouldn't have banned OP on the subject of being against calling for people to end their lives. Other aspects, maybe. Guess we agree to disagree.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They didn't get banned for saying "kys". They got banned for all the other horrible shit, as I said already.

In addition

Saying that is essentially the same as saying you want X person to end their life, so the difference is arbitrary.

Saying I wouldn't be upset is not the same thing as saying I want it to happen. These are two different things. You're all over defending OPs nonsense with the same line of bs that this was the core problem. It wasn't. There isn't much else to say - OP is full of shit and deserved the ban entirely.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Saying I wouldn't be upset is not the same thing as saying I want it to happen. These are two different things.

Hard disagree. Especially when you have graphic elaborations on how you'd picture it happening for example. You're just not coming out and saying it when the intent/desire underneath is obvious.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Examples are not "graphic elaborations".

You can try and push OPs lies about what was actually said and done, as well as the lies about the intent behind it (which is also obvious from their other comments, as I mentioned), but I'm not interested. Goodbye.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm also not going to pretend I'd be upset if Rowling [...] dropped a toaster into her bath because she somehow recognized how much of a deplorable piece of shit she is.

Pretty graphic of an elaboration if you ask me.

You can try and push OPs lies

Strawman, my argument is about defending the principle, i.e. telling people to end their lives, is unethical. Got nothing to do with OP.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Got nothing to do with OP.

Then it has nothing to do with the post here in PTB.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Nope, it's about the principle that was described here, in the post, and comments.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)