this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
1255 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

15945 readers
614 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
1255
Thoughts? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by fireweed@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
 

Image description:


Text: Amazon's electric cargo bikes have arrived in DC.

Image: A four-wheeled vehicle that appears to be a cross between a bicycle, a go-cart, and a mini-truck

Response text from high t alpha shemale @gluetaster: that's not a cargo bike man that's a loopholemobile

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We're obviously using "bike" to mean a vehicle allowed in a bike lane. Is a trike not allowed in a bike lane? Better ban these!

When people here are saying that the OP vehicle is "not a bike" we are saying it exceeds the limits of what should be allowed to occupy bike infrastructure.

Also, it's not about physical labor. It's about the CHANGE to the required physical labor and who is paying for it. The job just got more physically intense and I promise you the pay isn't going up enough to compensate for that.

I don't understand replies like this. I mean do you get on the internet and look for comments you can purposely misunderstand?