this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
131 points (82.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54622 readers
485 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] when@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly.

  • When we accept humans killing animals. We should also accept humans copulating with animals. In both cases, we are neglecting animal's consent and perspective. It's logically consistent.
  • If we value Animal's perspective and concent then both Killing and Raping of animals by the humans should be abolished. Another consistent argument.
[โ€“] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Only if you don't understand the many differences between fucking and eating?

[โ€“] when@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

From Animal's perspective, They are either getting Murdered or Raped without consenting for either. It would not be fair for the victim if we give verdict based on criminal's perspective.

[โ€“] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago

Look up the definition of murder and rape and tell me where it says animal. Last I checked it says person or people.