this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
474 points (97.4% liked)

World News

56628 readers
2414 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which people? Pretty sure you'd find lots of people doing just that, mostly those who are criticizing policies like the one in the article as well.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

In my experience many of the most strident critics of hair coverings refuse to see the similarity to anti-nudity laws, especially nipple covering which is specific to women.

I mean I think the downvotes speak to the fact that the average person is not willing to admit the harms that our own ideas of modesty cause.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Or they think you're using whataboutism to make it about an issue your personally care about instead of the still very real issue conveyed in the article.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I can kind of see that criticism but I think talking about our own issues and hypocrisy here has relevance here. We do very similar things in our countries and there's very little fuss about it.

And I did acknowledge that I agree Iranian morality policing should be condemned, so it's not like I'm trying to defend them, just talk about a related issue.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Then maybe don't make your statements "Yes... but", make them "Yes, and". It makes it less about how you think people should be worried about your issues and simply brings up a related issue as well.

And, again, it's not like people don't care. Just like it's not that people don't care about the climate crisis, economic inequality, or health care... it's just people only have so much energy to give. And the current systems we live in do not provide room for an overabundance of sharing it.