this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
13 points (84.2% liked)

Asklemmy

54641 readers
572 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Frankly I find it barbaric and think it should be abolished

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Athena5898@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So someone who is abused is the real aggressor if they finally end the abuse by ending the abuser? I certainly don't think so.

The fault is society for allowing the situation to get to that point. Desperate people do desperate things. Its foolish and cruel to look down on your pedestal and declare life is black and white and a person who takes a life never has a reason.

There are times when it is horrible but not acknowledging the complexity is exactly how you get people who look the other way when the killing is obscure in a system of policies. Say how we kill thousands a year through poverty or homelessness. Those deaths are not seen as horrible because it's slow and painful, instead of quick and painful. Maybe you will come back and say you don't feel this way but such quick snap judgment without analysis is exactly how we get here.

[โ€“] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It would be nice if self defense often meant an abused person ending their abuser, but what it usually looks like is shooting minorities.

[โ€“] Athena5898@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You are conflating a lot here.

This goes back to what I was saying ironically. The issue you are saying here is still a failure of society. Obviously someone killing a minority because they are a minority is not a act of self defense.

[โ€“] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Oh no no no, when I said killing minorities I meant more along the lines of white guys blowing away anyone that ain't white through a locked door in self defense.