this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
13 points (84.2% liked)

Asklemmy

54641 readers
572 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Frankly I find it barbaric and think it should be abolished

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Firstly, I’m anti capital punishment just to get that out of the way. Second I generally agree any given human is redeemable but I don’t actually know everyone so I won’t pretend that’s factual and I’d be open to the fact that’s actually not true. However I guess my question/point is if everyone was literally “redeemable” what does that actually mean or look like? and what process is actually reasonable to redeem people? If someone is a born psychopath, a repeat violent and sexual offender, how much time, energy and money should be put into redeeming them? What if a person doesn’t want to be redeemed? If you don’t do therapy with an open heart and receptive mind it won’t work I can’t imagine redeeming someone like who I described would be consensual and at that point… is it possible? Is nonconsensual redemption ethical?

It’s nice to think there’s a path for all of us that could lead somewhere good but reality is not everyone gets to be ok, even if you stripped every factor from the equation except biology, that would still be true.

The reason I am against capital punishment isn’t because I think every person is redeemable, even if most could be, it’s because I don’t trust the state to kill only those guilty and worthy of such a final judgment.