this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
680 points (99.9% liked)

Not The Onion

21804 readers
1348 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Mistakenly, we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and adjusting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product,” said Charles Poon, VP of vehicle hardware engineering, in a briefing this week with reporters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 39 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

I've been using an LLM for programming for last 6mo and it needs constant babysitting. It's basically something that just does the most straightforward thing without consideration of nuance, maintainability or whether to actually split into a module. This is very much not surprising.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, I use it for some programming tasks as well. I’m sick and tired of telling it that it did something wrong or simply omitted something, only to have it apologize and offer to fix its own mistakes.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 13 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The major problem is that the work of an LLM has a massive number of hidden 'assumptions' that you need to be aware of. If you don't already have a good working knowledge of the task you wont have an intuition about those assumptions. It's annoying.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, and for those who don't know, the rationalization output of the LLM is just so pursuasive. It sounds quietly confident and rattles off things that sound like real details.

People are believing the LLM output over actual human experts and the human experts have to expend non-trivial effort trying to disprove an LLM output before they can get on with the business of doing it right.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)