this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
904 points (99.8% liked)

Not The Onion

21821 readers
638 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Mistakenly, we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and adjusting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product,” said Charles Poon, VP of vehicle hardware engineering, in a briefing this week with reporters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 157 points 2 days ago (19 children)

Lol. Probably got bonuses then celebrated for identifying the issue and fixing it.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Heh, a few weeks back a new project manager at my work held a meeting about an upcoming project, and half the team was able to say the timeline was workable, but the specifics the project manager laid out would lead to disaster, and we just had to adjust the strategy, but still have same time and same cost. We spelled out exactly what would go wrong and how, based on previous attempts to do it the way he said. It was scheduled to be a weeklong project, which would have been a fine timeline.

He got stubborn, insisted that based on his research his approach was right, and while he would have us on standby in the unlikely event of a problem, he would largely outsource the project to a company that agreed with his plan.

So the project started Monday, and based on past experience we expected to be called into action on Tuesday morning and have to hustle, or maybe Tuesday end of day and really get overworked to close it in time. So Friday comes along and we are shocked that it must be going ok since we hadn't heard anything. 4pm rolls around, the project manager calls us in a panic saying it's all gone nowhere, zero progress made, and he has escalated to make sure we take over and now we had to make the Monday morning deadline, or our asses are screwed. Everyone worked their asses off, a couple didn't sleep the whole weekend.

So in a followup call, the project manager said "no one could have predicted it would go so badly", and then an email came out from executive team congratulating the project manager for making the project work despite challenging circumstances.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I hope the team was paid a nice overtime fee. Otherwise they should have just let it fail.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Well, salaried, so not 'overtime' per se, but at least I walked away with a bonus equivalent to about 4 months pay. Not solely due to that one incident, but that incident put things over the top.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Good for you.

Here in Belgium, with salary contracts, there is still a calculated daily pay, IIRC it is monthly salary / 22.

If I work on a non-work day, I get 150% of this for a Saturday or 200% of it for a Sunday or public holiday.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)