this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
1359 points (99.3% liked)

memes

21720 readers
2993 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is exclusively a problem of politcal and may be incompetence. It doesn't change the fact that Australia is extremely well suited for HSR covering the majority of its urban population. All with a single line.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is exclusively a problem of politcal and may be incompetence.

you are free to crique the last 50 years and 10 different government and private enterprise attempts at doing it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail_in_Australia

apparently you know better 👍

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

You are aware that your link confirms my point, aren't you? Countless studies showing that the corridor is feasible and makes sense, yet not a single project in 50 years, where the government has shown the political will to get serious about it, never mind showing long term commitment.

If you want to bring up actual arguments why what is possible in Japan, China and much of Europe is impossible on the Melbourne-Sydney corridor, be my guest.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

i give up mate, if you can’t read i can’t help you

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

No arguments? A pity.

it seems it wasn't me who didn't read your own source:

"Every federal government since this time has investigated the feasibility of constructing high-speed rail with speeds above 200 km/h, but to date nothing has ever gone beyond the detailed planning stage"

Even the US has come further already than that.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You’re confused why it’s not getting past the planning stage?

Maybe watch the video again? You’re literally the guy in it :)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8av3knflbQo

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, thanks for confirming my argument. The video is pretty much bringing up the arguments I'd expect. But it really shows how weak they are when they complain about distances being too far when they are actually perfect for HSR and yes, it is enough if individual relations are close enough. That is how many HSR networks work.

But sure, Australia is the only country with mountains and suburbs. And kanguruhs are an unsurmountable issues for rail, but not for highways.

It all boils down to ideology. Weirdly enough it was not impossible to build inner urban highways though, which required much more space. But then, unlike road infrastructure, rail is required to be proftibale and that is why Australia remains underdeveloped and its airports overloaded.

Add to that wavering back and forth with financial support a generally hostile legal environment towards HSR projects and generally hostile laws to building important large national infrastructure, balooning costs on any infrastructure project. I would not be surprised if more money would have to be spent on bureaucracy and judicial things than on actually building that thing. That is not much different from the US where they need to pay multiple times more per km than in other Western countries with comparable corridors.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Please stop down voting comments you disagree with, it makes you look like a dick

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I am not downvoting for content but debating style. You started off with ad hominem and then added not a single ( or a few) well defined argument but a video with dozens one liner arguments that cannot be addressed without writing half a book.

But maybe I am indeed in the wrong instance for that and it is indeed a wrong expectation on my side.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 57 minutes ago

a video with dozens one liner arguments that cannot be addressed without writing half a book.

Because you keep doing stuff like this, don’t bother writing a book, half a book, or even a paper, the idea you can convince me with something that no one in 50 years in Australia hasn’t thought of is insulting to the thousands of people and engineers who have worked on making it a reality

Here’s a serious video for you

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8nEaa3UI5QA

and if you go on youtube you’ll find a dozen more that go into it

If you’ve got 150 billion in your back pocket let me know and we can get started on this thing