this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
848 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

85921 readers
4264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

It's literally just taking the piss out of idiotic investors. Data Centers, AI, space, new frontier, new markets. It checks all the boxes to get idiots excited to dump money into your tech company so people keep talking about it because talking about it is what gets results. Hopefully nobody is dumb enough to actually try it, it's an absolute scam.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I mean, space construction companies are happy to try it.

If Bezos keeps giving them money, who are they to say no? It may not even all be a waste in the long run, as it could be a "testing ground" for future scientific missions.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I see it as a win-win.

Either Elom and his fellow dipshits waste a ton of cash chasing literal pie in the sky,

Or

A viable commercial presence in space is validated and terrestrial power needs eased.

/S

Can you all not even tell this or sarcasm?

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I see it as a win-win.

Except when they put up about 70x new satellites then what we currently have up there, and cause a cascade of collisions that results in nothing being able to enter orbit (including humans travelling to space).

We're at 14k satellites.

100k is the cascade failure limit.

Space X is proposing one million satellites.

Edit: my "70x" figure is very fuzzy just-woke-up early morning math. No guarantees.

Edit 2: dang! One million divided by 14k is 71.428! I almost nailed it.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

No, you don't get it. (Good job on the math though, btw)

Every AI gets to have one, huge Moonraker sized LLM space station. Grok Station 1, Gemini Geosynchronous, Claude Comet. Whatever. But all eggs in one huge solar-powered basket each.

Staffed by 1 or 2 humans each. Required. By law. Armed people. Because, of course they should have guns in space.

Then just see what happens. I bet it would be amazing.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Nah, you're not jaded enough yet, it'll be used to facilitate a wealth transfer. Huge wealth management firms will tie up venture capital in financing SpaceX and BO and smaller space construction firms in a boondoggle and when it fails to materialize a profit they will pocket the proceeds and the losses will be covered by taxes and retirement accounts.

They do this again and again. It's the kleptocracy playbook, they're just getting bigger and bolder and more in your face with it.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Looool gotcha, assume half the people on Lemmy reading your comment are half asleep, either just waking up or going to bed.