26
The two worlds of programming: why developers who make the same observations about LLMs come to opposite conclusions
(www.baldurbjarnason.com)
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
Yeah, same here
I needed to calculate some statistics from log files and that would have taken me ages - mostly because my sed-/awk-fu is lacking
But with AI I got a script in half an hour - after correcting it a few times - and it is reasonable ok enough for the job
I tried to refactor a really large spaghetti state machine with AI, but they're all failing, because it's too large
It's nice to get boiler plate code written, but when it comes to overview of logic on a large project, they obviously can't keep up
As you said, it's a tool. But just like with any tool, you shouldn't use it for every use case
Your statements are supposed to be moderate, but given the physical realities of actually running the massive LLMs it is terrible. Maybe you saved some time at the expense of learning to write your log script, but you also helped boil the oceans a bit in the process. All the things you tried and failed helped boil the oceans for no benefit at all. You're more optimistic about the utility of it than I am, but even given your perspective, it is a disaster when you consider the externalities of the AI data centers.
That's all correct and true
I was on a business trip, very sleep deprived and needed a fast solution
So, I guess, this was the tool for the job
Probably it got lucky, because with other things it just fucked up after that
So, my trust into it is nil
But for quick scripts, that would take me much longer to build, it's working
But I'm also usually using local models
I'm aware of their power and water consumption, and you're right in that
Edit: and besides the environmental impact, which I don't use them often or only locally, I'm still a tech guy and want to know, what they're actually capable of
Which still isn't much and I don't see LLMs getting better with more complexity
There are to many problems
We have programming languages for reason, because they're mathematically sound and not ambiguous
Human speech just isn't and that's already the point, why LLMs can never really work for that
But I was surprised, that it once came up with a solution to filter my log files and calculate some statistics out of it
And I have to give it that