this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
26 points (86.1% liked)

Programming

27526 readers
334 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
UlrikHD@programming.dev
bugsmith@programming.dev
Spyro@programming.dev
26
The two worlds of programming: why developers who make the same observations about LLMs come to opposite conclusions (www.baldurbjarnason.com)
submitted 13 hours ago by HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org to c/programming@programming.dev
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/52842255

Have been working my way through this author's essays, thought this one was a unique observation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Full context of the first quote:

Those who believe we’ve been in an incrementally escalating software crisis since at least 2007.

Our current software crisis – we’ve had a few – has been ramping up since the US gave up on regulation after the 2007 crash. Instead of reforming and regulating finance, the US decided to let the finance industry take over all of its industries, which hasn’t been great overall, but for software it’s meant that “quality” stopped mattering.

  • Well-funded startups capture market share with subsidised products.
  • Big tech is a cluster of oligopolies and monopolies.
  • Internal software projects are driven by their potential effects on stock prices (“UGC! No, Web 2.0! No, blockchain! No, AI!”).
  • Customer lock-in is a standard tactic.

There is little to no downside to poor software quality. The upside of doing the job well is limited compared to tactics like lock-in, dishonest subscription models, and monopolies

If his principal complaint is industry consolidation and consumer abuse, then the browser situation is not a great counterexample.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

Damn I'm saving that image