this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
867 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

85921 readers
4233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"Near" the surface, it's apparently around -21C, but its one crazy trick is surface area for heat sync. Once we start pushing heat into it, we'd have to do it in a REALLY huge surface area. Moon trenching....

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If you read the chart on that Wikipedia article carefully, the estimated temperature profile is based on data from two Apollo missions.

All of the Apollo missions spent all of their surface time during the lunar morning, relatively early into the 14-day lunar day. They did this partially because the cooling systems couldn't cope with the full heat of the day, and partially to ensure good backlighting during the landings.

So there is going to be some "diurnal" surface heating and cooling that is probably modeled but not measured.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

pulled it off a science substack, lined up nicely with https://science.nasa.gov/moon/weather-on-the-moon/

was unaware that data was incorrect