this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
421 points (95.7% liked)

World News

58135 readers
1694 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, Chinese leader Xi Jinping has pushed ethnic minority groups like Tibetans and Uyghurs to adopt an identity rooted in Chinese nationality and allegiance to the ruling Communist Party.

Now, that push has been codified into a sweeping new law that reaches into classrooms, neighborhoods and homes – and gives Beijing the right to target people outside of its borders that it believes violate its rules.

The statute, officially known as the Ethnic Unity and Progress Promotion Law, came into effect on July 1. It bans acts that “undermine ethnic unity or create ethnic division” among China’s 56 officially recognized ethnicities, which include a Han Chinese majority that makes up over 90% of the country’s 1.4 billion people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Example: Many Americans don't speak their native tongue.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's because English is the national language and the lingua franca. People adopt and use it out of their own will. There's no systematic policy in place that punishes people for speaking a different language with the intent of erasing them.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Intent or not, the outcome is there. You think the Irish immigrants decided on their own to forget their home language? They were derided as non-white and their language was part of that non-white identity.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, intent is EVERYTHING. That's literally what defines a genocide as one. People choosing to adopt a language out of their own volition because it's more convenient is just natural assimilation that comes with immigration. It only become cultural genocide when the state passes laws that punishes the use of one language and mandates the use of another by force with the intent of erasing the former by replacing it with the latter.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So if the government passes those same laws without the intent of genocide then it isn't genocide? Like China is saying the intent is harmony, not genocide.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The intent of the laws is what's up to interpretation. A lot genocides don't have an explicit policy like the Holocaust or the Armenian genocide. A lot tend have policies where the real intentions are hidden under some sham cover. That's why historians and other academic researchers examine policies by how they're implemented and enforced rather than how politicians or the state market them as.