World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Not making anything up. I've seen the sentiment plenty of time's and I'm not alone. And I wouldn't go to an ML for "truth" about themselves or anyone else any more than I could go to a capitalist for similar.
Either you're lying, misunderstanding, or you found someone with insane views. I kinda suspect its a mix of all 3, I can imagine someone pointing out that gender identity, race, national identity are all exploited to keep the working class divided against itself, but you have to have the most bad-faith interpretation to think they mean marginalized people should be ignored instead of that their struggle is a part of the struggle against capitalism. There's a lot of marxist takes on intersectionality, but none of them are "your only identity is government", that sounds like something a conservative would make up.
Capitalist=someone who owns capital. Liberalism is the philosophy of capitalism.
It's literally the justification I've seen many times for the way minority groups are treated in China and other similar areas. It's kind of the whole point of the stupid One China initiative. If that doesn't describe you, then great. Maybe you're a slightly reasonable statist. But even you slipped and started to acknowledge the lunacy of others that espose that ideology. Statist have a ton of insane views. Not just on the left. I have no issue acknowledging the good things places like China has done. I legit hope they break the current RAM cartels. The system I am posting from is currently using a fanxiang ssd. None of that makes up for the crimes of the state. And this sort of BS defending it. Yeah the headline here was hyperbolic and wildly editorialized. Just as much as your defense is dismissive of the same issues.
Minorities in China have special rights and autonomy. Cultural chauvanusm exists, but the government tries to prevent it, such as the law in question which increases penalties for discrimination against ethnic minorities. I have no idea where you're seeing people justifying something China doesn't do. Or by treatment did you mean building schools and using affirmative action?
Did you mean the One China Policy? Where PRC won't work with countries that acknowledge the RoC, due to both parties claiming to be the government of all of China?
That is entirely irrelevant.
Minorities in China are treated like second class citizens. If you’re not Han Chinese, you aren’t “good enough”. People complain about the US being xenophobic, but it’s mature hour compared to China.
I just love the way you say special rights and autonomy. Acting as if it's some good or laudable thing. While unconsciously telling on yourself. That and the fact that you cannot engage with anyone even when they try in good faith. And return that good faith.
Initiative, policy. The fact that this is what your quibbling over is extremely telling. As if it's meaningful or there's some big Grand difference. Maybe it was a policy initiative. The fact is you still didn't deny the existence of it.
I think you and I would both agree that the xenophobic white supremacist bigots in the United States for instance. That believe that there is one America, and immigrants/people with cultures they don't like aren't part of it. Is a bad thing. Yet you don't acknowledge the irony and hypocrisy of your stance.
I can tell you've never been part of a vulnerable group afforded "special rights and autonomy". As someone who has. It's 💯% bullshit. No group should have special rights. If it's acceptable for one it should be accessible to all. Anything else is just another regular failure of the state. At least I can be consistent and straight about it. Not twisting into pretzels like so many leninist defending their pet states.
Tibet, like the other autonomous areas has unique factors and circumstances, including an insurgency. If 1 house is on fire, would you recommend spraying all houses with water? Well 1 place needs economic development, education, preservation of the Tibeten language more than beijing or Shanghai.
I told you what it was, its China's policy regarding Taiwan, HK, Macao, and other areas with various levels of autonomy, but are still regarded as part of China, not some kind of policy supporting oppressing minorities or whatever the hell you're implying it is.