this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
469 points (97.6% liked)

memes

22006 readers
3071 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

My calculations make it 739,802

Baseline: 2025 * 365 = 739,125

Leap years: Floor(2025 / 4) = 506 - floor(2025 / 100) = 486 + floor(2025 / 400) = 491 (every 4th year except every 100th year with the exception of every 400th year)

1st of Jan 2026 to 5th of July 2026: 186

Total: 739,125 + 491 + 186 = 739,802

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why not just do 2025×365.2425 + 186?

Also note: the Gregorian calendar was not in use yet at the start of this, so that might throw off all your calculations

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wanted to show the full calculation, but that one works too.

And yes, you could do some more math to account for the 10 day drift the Julian calendar introduced but historians mostly use the proleptic Gregorian calendar which removes this for ease of use to better count orbits. If you want the actual sunrises since 1/1/0001 it should be enough to just add back 10 days.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait so you're telling me 2000 was not a leap year? But 2200 will be?

I was too young to really pay attention that year.

That's interesting about the proleptic calendar and stuff.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

2000 is divisible by 400 so it is a leap year. It goes "divisible by 4" is a leap year, "divisible by 100" not a leap year, "divisible by 400" the exception to the exception so this is a leap year too.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh fuck, I'm clearly too tired to do math in my head right now...

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you account for the switch from the Julian Calendar to the Gregorian Calendar?

Don't worry if you didn't, this has tripped up a number of apocalyptic religious cults as well, they had to rewrite their time tables to Doomsday when somebody pointed it out to them.

But yeah, basically, 10 days got wiped out of conceptual existence in the uh, great time refactor of 1582. ... and more confusingly, it wasn't like, globally adopted at the same time, so, sometimes, in some places, adoption resulted in the nullification of 11, 12, or 13 days.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I used the proleptic Gregorian calendar, so if you want to count sunrises you can just add 10 days. Historians use it for simplicity and accept the drift.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Excellent!

If Dr Who ever randomly abducts you, you'll be slightly better suited for the experiencd than most!

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] lavacake1111@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fixed, it was a typo